|
Purpose
|
 |
You are to review and
assess the evening's proceedings and all the assignments that do not
receive specific evaluations, from the time the meeting opens to the
time of your evaluation speech. |
|
|
 |
Your assignment is in 2
parts. One towards the end of the first half where you review the
meeting up to that point; and second, after the Toastmaster hands
back to the Chairman, where you continue your review and introduce
the evaluators and other meeting helpers (timer, quizmaster etc).
|
| |
 |
This is a detailed and
challenging task and to cover it in the scheduled time you have to
be concise and precise in what you report. Too many General
Evaluators are guilty of exceeding the time imposed. |
| |
 |
It is important that you
actually evaluate assignments. Do not fall into the trap of
just summarising what has happened during the meeting to date. |
| |
 |
Do not evaluate or comment on any presentation by a guest to the club or someone making an official or educational presentation. |
| |
 |
If you are an inexperienced
General Evaluator, prior preparation is essential. Use this website
to print out and study the guide sheets for the assignments you will
be evaluating. These will give you plenty of information on what is
required in those roles and help you find worthwhile
recommendations. |
|
|
|
|
|
In the early part of the meeting
|
 |
Note any program changes so
you know who is doing each role. |
|
|
|
|
|
What to do during your assignment - part 1
|
 |
You evaluate all
assignments from the meeting opening to the table topics evaluators.
You do not comment on the table topics themselves as that has been
done by the Table Topic Evaluators. |
 |
You are also at liberty to discuss
general aspects of the meeting such as starting on time, room
layout, meeting organisation etc. |
 |
You do not comment on the performance
of Chairman 2 in running the business session if there is a
Parliamentarian to fill that role. |
 |
5 minutes is not long to discuss the
several small assignments. This is long enough to give a 30 second
overview of trends or common issues, and about 20-30 seconds per
speaker. |
 |
As with all evaluations, your
presentation should be positive, upbeat, instructive and basically
congratulatory. |
| |
 |
In evaluating each speaker, do not
comment on the content of what was said. Rather, evaluate how well
each speaker met the objectives and carried out the duties of each
assignment. |
| |
 |
If there is a parliamentarian, you
should introduce him/her. |
| |
 |
You then hand back to Chairman 2. |
| |
|
That is the end of the first part of
your assignment. |
| |
|
|
|
What to do during your assignment - part 2
|
 |
You continue your
evaluation in the same vein as in part 1. You evaluate all
assignments in the second half except of course the speakers. It is
advisable towards the end of the evening to keep the proceedings
running swiftly and efficiently. |
| |
 |
You introduce each of the
speech evaluators, and remind the audience who they will be
evaluating. |
|
|
 |
If appropriate and
instructive, make a brief comment on the evaluator's performance or
style. If we are running out of time, keep the comments brief between each evaluator and ensure that evaluators are waiting in the wings to present. Ideally, the first evaluator should present just on 9.00pm. |
|
|
 |
Once the speech evaluations are
finished, thank the evaluators, and remind people to fill in their
voting slips and hand them to the Sergeant at Arms. You should also
remind the speakers to mark up the wall charts and to have the VPE
sign their speech manuals. |
|
|
 |
You now introduce the other
roles whose nature is to give an overview of the meeting. These may
include timer, um-ah counter and quizmaster, but not the awards. |
|
|
 |
When finished, hand back to
Chairman 2. |