|
Purpose
|
 |
Many believe this is the
most important job in Toastmasters. It is where most value can be
gained from participation, for the speaker, the evaluator and the
rest of the audience. |
|
|
 |
A good evaluation will be
firm, fair and friendly, focussing on HELPING the speaker progress. The main purpose is to make the speaker
want to speak again. This is done by showing WHY certain aspects of
the speech were good, and HOW other aspects can be improved. |
|
|
 |
There is ample direction on
how to give good evaluations in this website (see these
guidelines) and
other places. Most of this material will not be repeated here. |
|
|
|
|
|
When preparing
|
 |
Talk with the speaker
preferably a few days before the speech. Find out which speech they
are giving, their objectives, and any concerns they may have. |
|
|
|
|
|
Before the meeting begins
|
 |
Study the evaluator's
guide to the speech you are to evaluate. This is found in the
appropriate Communication and Leadership Manual. |
|
|
 |
Draw up a page to help take
notes more efficiently. Assemble headings to guide your thinking.
Include space for positives and areas for improvement. |
|
|
 |
Should the speaker be a last
minute apology, then you may find yourself evaluating someone else.
Check the program on arrival to see if this has occurred and make
necessary changes to your preparation. |
|
|
|
|
|
What to do during your assignment
|
 |
Your assignment starts in earnest the
moment the speaker's name is called. |
 |
Make precise and concise notes during
the speech. For positives, state what was good and why. Give
examples. For points for improvement, state what could be improved
and how to fix it. |
| |
 |
Assemble your notes into a speech,
focussing on the objectives of the assignment and whether or not
they were met. Use
the formula Commend, Recommend, Commend. Finish with a positive and
encouraging summary. |
| |
 |
Avoid commenting or adding to the
content, unless it is part of the evaluation criteria. Also, avoid
negative sounding words like "fault", "problem", "wrong". Remember
at all times there are no absolutes - the whole evaluation is your
opinion which you are offering. |
| |
 |
There are three aspects to your
evaluation task. The presentation to the whole meeting should focus
on helping the speaker and the audience learn from the presentation.
The written evaluation in the manual enables you to go into detail
on some aspects of the objectives that perhaps are not appropriate
for your talk, noting that the manual should never be taken to the
lectern or made part of your spoken evaluation. Finally, you should
have a one on one discussion with the speaker at the end of the
meeting. |
| |
 |
When finished, hand back to the General
Evaluator. |
| |
 |
Write up your comments in the speaker's
manual. |
| |
|
That is the end of your assignment. |